Legal Opinion
Mattingly v. Houston
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 11, 1964No. [No. 273, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSybert, J.
We are called upon in this appeal to determine whether the Circuit Court for Montgomery County erred in ordering reformation of a deed from the appellants to the appellees for certain lots in a subdivision.
The appellants, Joseph A. Mattingly and Marion Mattingly, his wife, engaged a firm of civil engineers in 1952 to prepare a preliminary plan of resubdivision for a part of a development owned by them in Montgomery County. The plan was approved by the appropriate authorities and the engineers marked with iron pipes the boundaries of the resubdivision, known as Block 2-C, Hillmead-Bradley…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffman v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Bagley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Keedy v. NallyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Moyer v. Title Guarantee Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Marlow, Infant v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chesapeake Homes, Inc. v. McGrathCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Maryland Port Administration v. John W. Brawner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Housing Auth. of College Pk. v. MACRO HOUSING, INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Mattingly v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Flester v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.