Legal Opinion

Aiken v. Andrews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The question for decision is whether the evidence, taken in its most favorable light for the defendants, suffices to overcome the *305demurrer and to carry tbe case to tbe jury on tbe counterclaim. Tbe trial court answered in tbe negative, ffe are inclined to a different view.

Defendant’s testimony is to tbe effect tbat be complied witb tbe terms of tbe written contract in every respect, tbat is, be completed tbe bouse as agreed, duly executed and tendered deed witbin tbe time stipulated, and plaintiff declined to accept it or to go through witb tbe deal. Tbis is evidence from which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Adams v. . BeasleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Pope v. . McPhailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Taefi v. StevensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. ACTION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API