Legal Opinion

Arkim v. Irvin

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1998No. 96-CV-0590HPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

The parties have consented pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons that follow, the petition is denied.

BACKGROUND

On April 27, 1990, petitioner was indicted by the Erie County grand jury on one count of rape in the first degree (N.Y.Penal Law § 130.35(1)), two counts of sodomy in the first degree (N.Y.Penal Law § 130.50(1)), two counts of burglary in the first degree (N.YPenal Law § 140.30(2) and (3)), one…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API