Legal Opinion
Kiernan v. Mauer
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 10, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 N.J. Super. 18 (1951)
80 A.2d 116
FRANK KIERNAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
RICHARD E. MAUER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 2, 1951.
Decided April 10, 1951.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and FREUND.
Mr. Jerome Alper argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Jerome Alper and Alper, attorneys).
Mr. Hubert J. Franklin argued the cause for the appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.
Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the action which was brought to recover the balance of the agreed price for the work performed on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rynar v. Lincoln Transit Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
- State v. MacFarlandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. SayreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Parking Authority of HackensackNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- McDonald v. MulvihillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- State v. HatchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Laurino Co., Inc. v. Daly Building Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952