Englert, Inc. v. Netherlands Insurance

We decide this case without oral argument, because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving the issues. We affirm.

Since this case was decided by way of summary judgment, the trial judge had to view all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the appellant. On appeal, this Court must take the same view of the evidence. Neither the trial court nor this Court, however, is “required to single out some one morsel of evidence ... to create an issue of fact that is not genuine.” Main v. Corley, 281 S.C. 525, 527, 316 S.E. (2d) 406, 407 (1984). In addition, affidavits…