Nichols v. Kilpatrick

1. This case involves a controversy between neighbors over a dividing land line between two city lots, involving a frontage of about twelve or thirteen inches. The verdict is supported by evidence.

2. The jury returned the following verdict: “We, the jury, find for the defendant. We find the true line between the lines of plaintiff and defendant is where the surveyor, Ereeman, found and designated it by his plats made in 1913 and 1921. We find the defendant is entitled to an injunction restraining plaintiff from interfering with defendant’s rights as found above.” One ground of the motion for…