Legal Opinion

Cale v. Kiner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1945No. 3838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*408OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Plaintiff plead in quantum meruit on am implied contract for services rendered. Issue was drawn upon an answer which was substantially a general denial with an affirmative plea of payment and a reply denying payment.

Plaintiff’s evidence as developed by her counsel in the opening statement to the jury would have established an express contract covering not only the agreement to pay for the services but the amount to be paid. This evidence could not have supported a verdict and judgment for plaintiff on, her cause of action as pleaded and on the issues drawn.

“Where there is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Goodyear Aircraft Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Kleinhans v. American Gauge Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Haber v. Bond Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API