Legal Opinion

Feitel v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 5, 1920No. 22750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

■ Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Suit by Maurice Peitel against' the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProvo Sty, J.

Plaintiff brings this suit upon the following clause of the accident policy issued to him by the defendant company :

“The Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York * * * does hereby insure the person herein called the assured named in statement A of the schedule of warranties against bodily injury sustained during the term of one year from noon, standard time, of the day that this policy is dated, through accidental means (excluding suicide, sane or insane, or any attempt thereat, sane or insane) and resulting directly, independently, and exclusively of all other causes, in—
“(a) Immediate,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wall v. Continental Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. OgburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Williams v. Preferred Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Mullins v. Masonic Protective Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canal-Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Thompson v. General Acc., Fire & Life Assur. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Shambaugh v. Great Northern Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Rauch v. American National InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API