Sinclair v. Thomas
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz
Plaintiff sues to recover for personal injuries sustained while riding in a car driven by the defendant. At the close of all the evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and entered judgment thereon. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was denied. On appeal, the sufficiency of the motion is questioned, defendant contending that it is too vague and general to meet the requirements of section 68.1(2) of the Civil Practice Act, Ill Rev Stats, c 110, § 68.1(2) (1965). The Supreme Court has resolved this question by its recent holding that where a verdict is directed, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Keen v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Connett v. WingetIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Dirksmeyer v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Gass v. CarducciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Enlow v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Erickson v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Justice v. JusticeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- People v. MorrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Hall v. Checker Taxi Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.