Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gordon v. Verizon Communications, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 2017No. 653084/13Published

1ConcurrenceMoskowitz, J.

I believe that the majority goes much further than is necessary to determine this appeal, purporting to set forth a new seven-part test to enhance the one established in Matter of Colt Indus. Shareholder Litig. (155 AD2d 154, 160 [1st Dept 1990], mod on other grounds 77 NY2d 185 [1991]). But no party to this appeal took issue with the existing Colt test, and therefore, neither party has had a chance to address this purported new standard. And even putting aside the fact that neither party has briefed the matter, we need not adopt a new standard to determine the issues before us, as the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodrow v. Colt Industries Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. David Pullman v. David A. Silverman, M.D.New York Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Woodrow v. Colt Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Klein v. Robert's American Gourmet Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Yannitelli v. D. Yannitelli & Sons Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API