Legal Opinion

Siegel v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 2012No. 4D10-3003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a final judgment awarding attorney’s fees. We reversed, however, the underlying judgment. Siegel v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, 71 So.3d 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). Therefore, as conceded by appellees, the award of attorney’s fees and costs must likewise be reversed. See S & I Invs. v. Payless Flea Mkt., Inc., 40 So.3d 48, 49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (quoting Viets v. Am. Recruiters Enters., Inc., 922 So.2d 1090, 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“ Where a court awards prevailing party attorney’s fees and the underlying judgment is vacated, the attorney’s fee judgment must also be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S & I INVESTMENTS v. Payless Flea Market, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. McNamara v. City of Lake WorthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. GrossmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Siegel v. JP Morgan Chase BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lucas Games, Inc. v. Morris AR Associates, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Ring Power Corp. v. Condado-PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Ring Power Corporation v. Condado-PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API