Arcelormittal USA Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
EATON, Judge:
This action is before the court on plaintiff agency record. 1 By its motion, plaintiff contests certain aspects of the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “Department”) final results of the eleventh administrative review of the antidump-ing duty order applicable to imports into the United States of corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (“CORE”) from Korea for the period of review August 1, 2003, through July 31, 2004. See Certain CORE from the Republic of Korea, 71 Fed. Reg. 7,513 (Dep’t of Commerce Feb. 13, 2006) (eleventh admin, review), as…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.