James and Martha Kuper and Charles and Kathleen Kuper, Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:
Once again we confront taxpayers who have taken a circuitous route to reach an end more easily accessible by a straightforward path. Looking to substance rather than form, we decide that the instant transactions must be taxed for what realistically they are — an exchange of stock and a dividend. The Tax Court heard the present controversy, 61 T.C. 624 (1974), and found a taxable exchange of stock — a determination which we affirm. That same court, however, failed to denominate the cash transfer of corporate funds a dividend, and it is this latter decision which, for…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Magnon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Stinnett's Pontiac Service, Inc., Richard W. Stinnett and Gay P. Stinnett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.