Legal Opinion

James and Martha Kuper and Charles and Kathleen Kuper, Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1976No. 74-3138PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge:

Once again we confront taxpayers who have taken a circuitous route to reach an end more easily accessible by a straightforward path. Looking to substance rather than form, we decide that the instant transactions must be taxed for what realistically they are — an exchange of stock and a dividend. The Tax Court heard the present controversy, 61 T.C. 624 (1974), and found a taxable exchange of stock — a determination which we affirm. That same court, however, failed to denominate the cash transfer of corporate funds a dividend, and it is this latter decision which, for…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  3. Magnon v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  4. Stinnett's Pontiac Service, Inc., Richard W. Stinnett and Gay P. Stinnett v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Stobie Creek Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API