Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. McGuire

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the addition of the word "forthwith” to the statutory provisions in question does not alter the rule of Matter of Pierne v Valentine (291 NY 333, 342) but, rather, only precludes an unnecessary or unwarranted delay which is not presented in this case.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Pierne v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curiale v. CapolinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Ameruso v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Braun v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Degnan v. ConstantineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Benson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API