Legal Opinion

METROKA v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT, MONTGOMERY COUNTY

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00601Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NADIA MARY METROKA : CIVIL ACTION : v. : No. 23-601 : PENNSYLVANIA STATE LAW : ENFORCEMENT, et al. : MEMORANDUM Chief Judge Juan R. Sánchez June 15, 2023 Pro se Plaintiff Nadia Mary Metroka seeks to bring suit against the Pennsylvania State Law Enforcement Agency (the “Agency) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Previously, Metroka voluntarily dismissed the Agency, but she now seeks leave to file an amended complaint against it. Because state agencies are not “persons” subject to suit under § 1983, and because the Court would…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Stanford Shane Otis Terrell Robert Stewart v. William Fauver, Commissioner James Barbo, Administrator Rogers, Chief Director of CustodyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API