State v. Fogg
Supreme Court of Vermont
Indictment for larceny of a horse. Plea, not guilty. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1900, Windsor County, Start, J., presiding. Verdict guilty. The respondent excepted. Heal'd on the respondent’s exceptions and petition for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, J.
The only exception saved by the respondent at the trial was to the argument of the state’s attorney, which was, in substance, that the respondent went away from the town of Hartford in the fall of 1896 because of his knowledge of the pendency of this charge against him, and that he kept away because he knew of the indictment. It appeared that the horse was stolen from a pasture in Hartford, in June, 1896; that the respondent was indicted therefor at the December term, 1896, of the Windsor County Court; that the indictment was not put on file and made public until February, 1900; that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Husted v. MeadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
3Cited by2 opinions
- Simpson v. PerfettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- State v. BrittellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918