Legal Opinion

Rodriquez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 1992No. 92-00092PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Modesto Rodriquez appeals the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief which was filed and considered while an appeal from a previously filed motion was pending in this court. We affirm the order of denial because the trial court was without jurisdiction when it considered the motion. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla.1981); Braxton v. State, 568 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), cause dismissed, 577 So.2d 1325 (Fla.1991). The appeal that was pending at the time of the denial of the motion under review in this appeal has now been determined in appellant’s favor. Because the motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MenesesSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Braxton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Allman v. WolfeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API