Legal Opinion

In re Will of Cox

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 1, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.

The will of Ruth M. Cox was allowed after a contest in the Probate Court. Appeal was taken to the Supreme Court of Probate, and following an extended hearing, the appeal was dismissed, thus affirming the action of the Probate Court. The case comes forward upon exceptions which are grouped in three categories:

1. That the statutory requirements as to the execution of the will were not complied with.

2. That there was lack of testamentary capacity on the part of the testatrix at the time of its execution.

3. That the will was procured by the undue influence of Thomas Downs, the principal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitsett v. BelueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Rogers, In re the proposed will of DeeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1924
  3. MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  4. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of KearneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  5. O'BrienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Lunders' EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In re Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  3. Estate of TurfSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. In Re Will of FenwickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. CrockettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API