Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Roth v. Judge of the District Court

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1886No. 9586PublishedCited by 6 opinions

A PPLICATION for Mandamus and Prohibition.

1Opinion of the Court

Tne opinion of the Court was delivered by

Manning, J.

The relator alleges that John E. Neely has filed a suit ■against him in the Iberville court for the settlement of an alleged planting partnership in which Neeley has obtained writs of injunction and sequestration, the first prohibiting the relator and the sheriff from removing or selling any part of the partnership property, and the last sequestering the whole of that property — that ho applied to the judge-to bond botli the injunction and the sequestration and was refused,, and hence applies for a mandamus to compel the judge to grant these…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ramos Lumber & Mfg. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. Davenport v. Sterling Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Board of Liquidating Com'rs of Bank v. DodsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  4. Barrow v. DuplantisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Knighton v. DerryberrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API