Legal Opinion

Millspaugh & Irish Co. v. Lunte

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1924No. 11,884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDausman, P. J.

The provision of the compensation law, as originally enacted, concerning the duty of an employer to furnish treatment to an injured employee during the first thirty days after the injury, is familiar. §25, Acts 1915 p. 392, §8020il Burns’ Supp. 1918. By an amendment to that section the following has been inserted:

“If, by reason of the nature of the injury or the process of recovery, treatment is necessary for a longer period than thirty days, the Industrial Board may require the employer to furnish such treatment for an additional period, not exceeding thirty days.” §25, Acts 1919 p. 158,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johansen v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Hornbrook-Price Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. In re McCaskeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. John A. Schumaker Co. v. KendrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meznarich v. Republic Coal Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. General Motors Corp. v. SocorsoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. General Motors Corp. v. SocorsoSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
  4. Desrosiers v. Dionne Bros. Furniture, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
  5. Franklin Township v. LitchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API