Union Investment Co. v. Hunt
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentJohnson, C. J.
I cannot agree with the majority opinion. In my opinion the effect of the majority opinion is to overrule a line of decisions which are-now considered rules of property in this State. The majority opinion is to the effect that the solemn recitals of a judgment or decree may be contradicted by an affidavit. This is not the law and has never been, in my opinion.
The decree in this case reads as follows: “That due and proper service has been had upon all the owners of said lands and real estate hereinafter described by means and reasons of the publication of a notice of the pendency and purpose…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Clay v. BilbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- McDonald v. Fort Smith & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Shaw v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Price v. GunnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.