Legal Opinion
Allen v. Avondale Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided November 15, 1938PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Per curiam
In 1921, a tract of land in the City of Jacksonville was subdivided into more than 1000 lots, was platted and designated as Avondale, and put on the market as a restricted residential subdivision. The restrictive covenant involved in this litigation was written in all deeds as sales were made and is as follows:
“2. That said land shall be used only for residential purposes, and not more than one residence and the outbuildings thereof, such as garage, stable, servants’ house and like outbuildings, shall be allowed to occupy 'said land or any part thereof, at any one time, nor shall any building…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Osius v. BartonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Edgewater Beach Hotel v. Bishop, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
3Cited by25 opinions
- Frankel v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Port Royal, Inc. v. ConboyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Wahrendorff v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Vetzel v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Lebo v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.