Legal Opinion

Leary v. Leary

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

This is a motion for an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

There are two causes of action and in the first it is set forth that plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife and then it appears later that a separation agreement was entered into. As stated in paragraph “ 5 ” the said agreement was entered into, with the intention that the parties thereto “should immediately thereafter separate, and in contemplation of such immediate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winter v. . WinterNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Carson v. MurrayNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Madole v. GavinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Fives v. FivesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1924
  5. Gray v. ButlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of TierneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. LaMontagne v. LaMontagneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API