Eythe v. Commercial Bank Savings Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLloyd, J.
The evidence discloses that at the time of the execution of the above mentioned deed of - conveyance the bank delivered to Mr. and Mrs. Hughes the notes secured by the mortgage and the intent unquestionably was to accept the conveyance of the real estate in satisfaction thereof and of the mortgage. The bank did not make the plaintiff a party to the action of .foreclosure, and did not have actual knowledge of his judgment lien, but nevertheless, must be held to have had constructive notice thereof. The uncontradicted testimony of witnesses is that the value of the real estate is very much less…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Marshall v. EblingOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
- Peoples State Bank v. First National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Giovannoni v. Corryville Bldg & Savings Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1938
- Thorp Consumer Discount Co. v. HartiganOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Washington Mutual Bank v. ChiappettaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.