Legal Opinion

State v. Parmar

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. S-95-337PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Claiming that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct the jury and (2) his trial counsel failed to object to the court’s instructions, LeRoy J. Parmar, through a motion for postconviction relief, sought to have his felony murder conviction and life sentence for that crime set aside.

The postconviction court denied Parmar an evidentiary hearing and refused to grant him postconviction relief. Parmar appeals from the judgment of the postconviction court and in addition claims that the postconviction relief court should have appointed counsel to represent him on his postconviction relief…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DeanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RussellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. LoweNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RehbeinNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ParmarNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. OrdunaNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. McHenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API