Legal Opinion

Brown v. Harding

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1916PublishedCited by 10 opinions

PetitioN to rebear tbe above entitled case, wbicb was decided at tbe last term (170 N. 0., 253).

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

Tbe errors assigned are substantially tbe same as those we considered in tbe original appeal.

First. Tbe objection tbat tbe judgments upon wbicb tbis suit is based were invalid or irregular and, therefore, were not liens upon tbe land, is clearly untenable. There is nothing on tbe face of tbe judgments to show their invalidity, but, on tbe contrary, everything to show tbat they were rendered according to tbe course and practice of tbe court. These judgments are more certain and formal than were those in Davis v. Shaver, 61 N. C., 18, and Sharpe v. Rintels, ibid., 34, which were held to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Journal Publishing Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Ferrell v. . HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Wilson v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Chadbourn Sash, Door & Blind Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Casket Co. v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Chandler v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Grantham v. . NunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API