Legal Opinion · Dissent

Village of Hampton v. Gausman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1939No. 30425Published

1DissentPaine, J.

I have been unable to reach the same conclusion that is set out in the opinion adopted by the majority of the members of this court, and therefore file this dissent.

*561This was a rather unusual case in several particulars, and after the first argument to our court, made November 9, 1938, no opinion was agreed upon, and a reargument was ordered February 20, .1939.

As I understand it from an examination of the record before us, the facts may be briefly stated as follows: This is an action brought by the village of Hampton upon the official bond of the village treasurer for loss of village funds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morley v. Town of MetamoraIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. People ex rel. Logan County v. ToomeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. County of Wapello v. BighamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  4. Ida County Savings Bank v. SeidenstickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Board of Administrators v. McKowenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API