Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 2016No. 186 110829/07PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered May 1, 2014, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to address the issue of a 90/180-day serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants correctly contend that they addressed plaintiff’s claim of a serious injury in the 90/180-day category. Moreover, they established prima facie that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury of that type by submitting evidence that the injuries…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Santos v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Amamedi v. ArchibalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Chaston v. DoucoureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Mejia v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pouchie v. PichardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  2. Streety v. ToureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API