Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1934No. 31077PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

There are three assignments of error: First, that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict of acquittal. We have examined the evidence, and find it ample to avoid a peremptory charge. Second, that the court erred in granting the state’s third instruction. Whatever inaccuracy or obscurity there may be in that instruction was well cured by the elaborate and clearly drawn instructions granted at the request of the defendant. Third, that the court erred in refusing the following instruction requested by the defendant: “The court instructs the jury for the defendant that the reputation for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Pritchett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Potera v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gurley v. TuckerMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mickell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bester v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Isaiah Jerome Gunn v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Kermit O'Neal Mickell v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API