Legal Opinion

Maanum v. Rieffer

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1987No. 86-5269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal meriting discussion is whether 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (1982 & Supp. II 1984) automatically stays the statutory time period in which a debtor may cure the cancellation of a contract for deed. We hold that the running of this statutory time period is not automatically stayed under section 362(a), but rather is temporarily stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 108(b) (Supp. II 1984).

In March 1979, Carol and Marion Rieffer, as vendors, and Ralph and Dorothy Maanum, as vendees, entered into a contract for deed with respect to 880 acres of farm land…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. First National Bank Of MontevideoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
  2. S. R. A., Inc. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. In Re Petition of S. R. A. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re HenkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1988
  2. In Re MaanumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API