Legal Opinion

Tilton Safe Co. v. Tisdale

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 15, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

GENERAL Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue, trial by jury, and verdict for plaintiffs, December Term, 1874, Powers, J., presiding. Plaintiffs were dealers in safes known as the Tilton, McFarland safe, and on the 18th of February, 1878, one Jacobs, plaintiffs’ traveling agent and salesman, negotiated a sale of one of plain-tills’ safes to the defendant, at St. Johnsbury, and on that day took an order for a safe as follows : '■'■Messrs.

Read the full summary

GENERAL Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue, trial by jury, and verdict for plaintiffs, December Term, 1874, Powers, J., presiding. Plaintiffs were dealers in safes known as the Tilton, McFarland safe, and on the 18th of February, 1878, one Jacobs, plaintiffs’ traveling agent and salesman, negotiated a sale of one of plain-tills’ safes to the defendant, at St. Johnsbury, and on that day took an order for a safe as follows : '■'■Messrs. Tilton, McFarland: — Please send me as soon as possible, 1 No. 4 safe with combination lock, for which I agree to pay $150 as follows; $75 in six months from…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

“The plaintiffs shipped a No. 4 safe with combination lock of their make to the defendant.” This was so far a strict *89compliance with the defendant’s order. It was the very thing the terms of the order called for. There was no implied warranty as to the merit or usableness of the lock, but only that it should be answerable to the call of the order. If it did not answer that call, or if the plaintiffs practiced a fraud in the matter of the body of the safe or the lock, it was the right of the defendant to return the safe as soon, within…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886
  2. Schaffner v. National Supply Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Norton v. GleasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  4. Unadilla Silo Co. v. M. A. Hull & SonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  5. Curran & Wolf v. Hauser, Kramer & Co.Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API