Legal Opinion

Clackner v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1870PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from the Wayne Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

The appellant was indicted in the court below for stealing hams, lard, and lard-cans. Trial by jury; verdict, guilty; motion for a new trial overruled; and judgment. •

There are two grounds on which it is insisted that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial, the exclusion of evidence, and misdirection of the jury in charges given by the court.

The defendant had introduced as a witness one Henry Long, who gave material testimony for him. After the defendant bad closed bis testimony, the State called one Kimmel who testified that the general character of Long was bad. The…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re GannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dedrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Suddeth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API