Legal Opinion

Goss v. Medical Service of the District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1983No. 81-1276PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from the court’s ruling that the placement of crowns and bridges on the teeth in the course of treatment of temporomandibular joint syndrome constituted dentistry and hence was properly excluded from coverage in appellees’ insurance contract. Appellant also appeals the trial court’s denial of class certification and accompanying motion to compel discovery. We conclude that the purpose for the placement of crowns and bridges on Mrs. Goss’ teeth was medical, not dental, and hold that the Gosses should have been reimbursed by appellees. We further hold,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graybeal v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  2. Simpson v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  3. Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. LevinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Group Hospitalization, Inc. v. WestleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meade v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Celtic Life Ins. Co. v. FoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc. v. HagnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Blair v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Pilot Life Insurane Co. v. RycekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API