Legal Opinion

City of Columbus v. Barr

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1953No. 33513Published

1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.

The defendant argues and the Court of Appeals held that section 1089-1 of the city ordinances is in conflict with the following provision of Section 13064, General Code, which became effective September 21, 1943:

*211“Whoever, for his own profit, establishes, opens, sets on foot, carries on, promotes, makes, draws or acts as ‘backer’ or ‘vendor’ for or on account of a lottery or scheme of chance, by whatever name, style, or title denominated or known, whether located or to be drawn, paid or carried on within or without this state, or by any of such means, sells or exposes for sale anything of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kraus v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API