Legal Opinion

Ingrim v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 2, 1964No. 63-884PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s petition for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. The principal contentions are that he was entitled to a hearing on the question of (a) his allegation that the police officer who testified for the State was guilty of perjury, and (b) that appellant was prejudiced by the failure of the Court to appoint counsel prior to his arraignment.

Appellant’s allegation as to perjury of a police officer has been determined to be legally insufficient to constitute a valid collateral attack in the absence of an allegation…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RefugeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  2. Barnett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Estevez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API