Livingston v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Rehearing
HARWOOD, Presiding Judge.
In his brief in support of the applicátion for rehearing, counsel for appellant states that we made no specific reference to the refusal of appellant’s requested charges 1-3 and E-l. The principles sought to be covered by these charges, so far as they could be applicable to the issues raised in the trial below, were in our opinion fully covered in the court’s oral charge, or the charges given at appellant’s request.
These charges furthermore were faulty in one or more specific aspects.
Charge E-l is misleading and argumentative as applied to the issues…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gilmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Wiggins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932