Grim v. Reinbold
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 53, July T., 1891, by plaintiff, Jacob L. Grim, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., June T., 1886, No. 3, on verdict for defendant, Charles H. Reinbold. Replevin for goods bought at sheriff’s sale.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 53, July T., 1891, by plaintiff, Jacob L. Grim, from judgment of C. P. Northampton Co., June T., 1886, No. 3, on verdict for defendant, Charles H. Reinbold. Replevin for goods bought at sheriff’s sale. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court and the charge of the court below, Schuyler, P. J., which was as follows: “ This is an action by Jacob L. Grim against Charles H. Reinbold, to recover possession of one truck wagon, a lot of dressed and undressed marble, a lot of bluestone, a lot of flagging, etc. It is undisputed that all this property, except the truck wagon,…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Green,
The undisputed evidence in this case shows that the writ of execution, under which the defendant’s goods were sold by the sheriff, was for the sum of $106 aud costs, and that on the morning of the day of sale the defendant paid to the sheriff the whole of the principal of the debt, and asked a little time in which to raise the amount of the costs, $26.00. His request was refused, and the sheriff proceeded to sell, and did sell, at once, *450the entire stock in trade of the defendant, consisting of coping-stone, flag-stone, marble, dressed and undressed, finished…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Klopp v. WitmoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
- Rowley v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1803
- Furbush v. Greene & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885