City of Anniston v. Dodd

This was a suit by' appellee against appellant and one Parker (street su-, perintendent of appellant city), claiming damages on account of injuries suffered as the proximate result of the negligence of the -appellant in allowing or permitting a defect in one of its streets. From the judgment in his favor against the city, this appeal is prosecuted.

A discussion of the evidence would'not be helpful.

Upon a reasonable construction of the bill of exceptions, it sufficiently appears that appellant duly reserved an exception to the following portion of the trial court’s oral charge to the jury:

“ * *…