Legal Opinion

Soderquist v. Glander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1951No. 32658Published

1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.

The sole question presented to this court in the present case is whether the percentage payments to applicant by McNeil, which were derived from the contracts of employment between applicant and McNeil, constituted royalties subject to the intangible tax, within the meaning of the provisions of Section 5323, General Code. If those payments were the result of investments they are taxable. If, however, they constituted compensation under a contract of employment they are not taxable.

So far as relevant to the issue presented to us, Section 5323, General Code (115 Ohio Laws, 548; 120 Ohio Laws,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of French v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API