Legal Opinion

Coker v. Life & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 10, 1935No. 10522PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Russell, Chief Justice.

As we construe the question propounded by the Court of Appeals, it must be answered in the affirmative. It is well settled that reference may be had to either the bill of exceptions, the certificate of the judge, or the transcript of the record, in determining whether or not a bill of exceptions has been tendered within the time prescribed by law. Bonds v. Berdett, 113 Ga. 113 (38 S. E. 304), citing Cloudis v. Bank of Tennessee, 6 Ga. 481; Russell v. March, 6 Ga. 491; Justices v. Barrington, 6 Ga. 578; Newton v. Burtz, 44 Ga. 599; Dismuke v. Trammell, 64 Ga. 429;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Dismuke v. TrammellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Gregory v. Daniel & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Cloudis v. Bank of TennesseeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  5. Bonds v. BerdettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Smith v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Pierce v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Terrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Wilson v. DobbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API