Hoar v. Prescott Park Arts Festival, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
Defendant, Prescott Park Arts Festival, Inc., (“Prescott Park”), moved to dismiss the Title VII action brought by plaintiff, pro se, Jonathan R. Hoar, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Prescott Park asserted that it was not an employer as defined under Title VII at 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e(b) because it lacked the requisite number of employees. Plaintiff objected but did not provide appropriate factual support for his arguments. Recognizing plaintiffs pro se status, the court afforded him an opportunity to address the issue of the number of Prescott Park’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Aversa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Laura L. OST, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEST SUBURBAN TRAVELERS LIMOUSINE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Agnes VERA-LOZANO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INTERNATIONAL BROADCASTING, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steele v. Ocwen Federal Bank (In Re Steele)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2001
- Cousin v. Sofono, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- March v. Technical Employment, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Curran v. Morrissette, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Vidal-Rodriguez v. MEC Engineering PSCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024