Legal Opinion

Bell v. Atlanta Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1915No. 5675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Affidavit of illegality; from municipal court of Atlanta. April 19, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

1. A second affidavit of illegality is not maintainable if based on the same facts that the first affidavit was based upon. The fact that the first affidavit was dismissed, without a trial of the issues raised or attempted to be raised by it, does not make an exception to the rule. Civil Code, § 6288; Hurt v. Mason, 2 Ga. 367; Leonard v. Collier, 53 Ga. 388 (3) ; Burnett v. Fouche, 77 Ga. 550; Fuller v. Vining, 87 Ga. 600 (13 S. E. 635) ; Baker v. Smith, 91 Ga. 143 (16 S. E. 967) ; Binder v. Ragsdale, 100 Ga. 400 (28 S. E. 165); Cone Export &c. Co. v. McCalla, 113 Ga. 17 (38 S. E. 336).

2.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Binder v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Burnett v. FoucheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Cone Export & Commission Co. v. McCallaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Fuller & Oglesby v. ViningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Georgia State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Elders v. BeasleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  3. Bell v. TysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API