Legal Opinion
Coulter v. Martin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 22, 1940No. 4-5865PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffxN Smith, C. J.
A cause styled “W. A. Boyd, et al., v. Donia Baker, et al.,” was pending in Columbia chancery court.
January 24, 1939, C. M. Martin petitioned to intervene. The court found that the property subject-matter was encumbered with a judgment. There was decree of foreclosure in ¡Boyd’s favor for $1,171.10.
Response to Martin’s intervention was filed by the defendants through their attorney, Boone T. Coulter. It was found that Martin, because of legal services rendered the respondents, was entitled to a half interest in minerals pertaining to the land. Baker v. Boyd, 196 Ark. 563, 119 S. W. 2d 524.
Mart…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Felker v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Old American Insurance Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Coston v. Lee Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Baker v. BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- McLain v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wear v. BoydstoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Fullerton v. FullertonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Kahn v. HardySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Mueller v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Stewart-Morris Implement Co. v. KoenigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.