Legal Opinion
United States v. Finazzo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 2017No. 14-3213-cr(L), 14-3330-cr(Con)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DRONEY, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Christopher Fi-nazzo is a former merchandising executive for teen apparel retailer Aéropostale, Inc. Defendant-Appellant Douglas Dey controlled South Bay Apparel Inc. (“South Bay”),- a clothing vendor. Between 1996 and 2006, Finazzo caused Aéropostale to use South Bay as its supplier of T-shirts and fleeces in exchange for secret payments to Finazzo of portions of South Bay’s profits. As a result of this scheme, Finazzo and Dey were charged in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York with one count of conspiracy to commit…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. Wallach, Rusty Kent London, Eugene Robert Wallach, A/K/A "E. Robert (Bob) Wallach," and Wayne Franklyn ChinnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Fed. Ins. Co. v. United States, United States v. MazerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. RutiglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
- United States v. LebedevCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- United States v. GattoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.