Legal Opinion
Grass v. Eiker
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 1956No. 1790, 1791PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
William H. Grass and his mother, Amalia Grass, brought separate actions on two promissory notes executed by appellee. The ' notés, in the face amounts of $2,694.98 and $1,170, were payable on demand. One was dated September 27, 1940, and the other June 1, 1941. A payment of $1 had been made on the larger note in 1949. After these actions were commenced on April 30, 1955, appellee moved to dismiss them on the ground they were barred by our three-year statute of limitations. 1 Appellants then amended their complaints to show that on December 31, 1954, appellee had filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hornblower v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Roper v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McCloskey & Co. v. DickinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Trethewey v. Green River Gorge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Fowler v. PilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey v. GreenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Griffith v. ButlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jones v. Government Employees InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Heffelfinger v. GibsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.