Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Scandrett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 22, 1940No. 9392PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Appellant sued under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 51-59, to recover for an injury sustained while employed as baggage-man by appellee railroad company and its trustees.

At the close of appellant’s case, which was being tried to a jury, the court granted appellees’ motion for an involuntary dismissal. The principal question here involves the propriety of this order. There is a subsidiary question concerning the exclusion of certain evidence offered by appellant.

Following is a summary of the facts as testified by appellant and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Craine v. Oliver Chilled Plow WorksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Division 525, Order of Ry. Conductors of America v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Ferrara v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API