Legal Opinion

Robertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1935No. 17204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted

*650The record is before us without any statement of facts. Hence we cannot determine the insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of conviction.

By bill of exception No. 1 the appellant complains of the action of the trial court in not permitting the appellant to ask the prosecuting witness, for the purpose of impeaching him, if it was not a fact that he had been on drunken parties with certain lewd women, but the bill of exception fails to show what answer the witness would have made to the question. Hence the bill fails to reflect…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API