Robertson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
The appellant was tried and convicted
*650The record is before us without any statement of facts. Hence we cannot determine the insufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment of conviction.
By bill of exception No. 1 the appellant complains of the action of the trial court in not permitting the appellant to ask the prosecuting witness, for the purpose of impeaching him, if it was not a fact that he had been on drunken parties with certain lewd women, but the bill of exception fails to show what answer the witness would have made to the question. Hence the bill fails to reflect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Welch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Henry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941