Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mollerup Van Lines v. Adams

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1965No. 10101Published

1DissentHenriod, Chief Justice

(dissenting) :

Applicant, Tyven Adams, has suffered three industrial accidents: 1) While working for Mollerup in 1958, lifting a truck wheel, he slipped and fell and something “popped” in his back, which troubled him somewhat, but did not prevent him from working thereafter. The Commission ordered Mollerup’s insurance carrier to pay $374.50 compensation for a “permanent disability amounting to 5% loss of bodily function,” — a fact found by a medical panel appointed by the Commission under statutory authority.1 Thereafter, and before the second accident, he worked at Kennecott Copper and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oberg v. SandersUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Burton v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API