Legal Opinion

Minor v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1968No. 4493PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a finding of paternity against appellant in a bastardy proceeding, trial by jury having been waived. A close scrutiny of the record reveals sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s judgment. Appellant argues, however, that evidence produced by him at trial proved that he could not be the putative father. Our study of the record shows that the evidence was in direct conflict. This being the case, as we have said on numerous occasions, the question is for the trial court to resolve as trier of fact, and not this court. Jackson v. District of Columbia,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. Lucas v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Adams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Harrison v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Beckwith v. BeckwithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. S.A. v. M.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Sa v. MaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API