Legal Opinion
Estes v. Metropolitan Warehouse, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 17, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 7, 2006, which ruled that the State Insurance Fund is not liable for the payment of workers’ compensation benefits to claimant.
The employer applied to the State Insurance Fund (hereinafter SIF) for workers’ compensation coverage for 13 employees in March 2004. Shortly thereafter, when an audit revealed that the employer actually employed twice the number of employees as was indicated in the employer’s application, SIF issued a revised bill reflecting a higher premium. By May 2004, having received no additional payments,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Linens Plus, The Linen Mill Outlet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Frazer v. Additional Personnel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Claim of Rue v. Northeast Timber Erectors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Vasquez v. Ranferi Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Trojcak v. Valiant Millwrighting & Warehousing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Craig v. Leatherstocking Healthcare, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Osorio v. M & L Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bonilla v. Country RotisserieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Claim of Johnson v. Via Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bonilla v. Country RotisserieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.